Home / S66 · Series 66: Uniform Combined State Law Exam / Module 4: Laws, Regulations and Guidelines

S66 · Series 66: Uniform Combined State Law Exam·UnitS66 · Unit 04Access: Premium

Module 4: Laws, Regulations and Guidelines

Prepare for Module 4: Laws, Regulations and Guidelines with practice questions covering 8 topics. Part of Series 66: Uniform Combined State Law Exam — build your knowledge and track your progress with GoFINRA.

Questions
961
Topics
8
Access
Premium

What’s in it.

8 topics
  • Topic 01

    Regulation of Investment Advisers

    75 questions
  • Topic 02

    Regulation of Investment Adviser Representatives

    83 questions
  • Topic 03

    Regulation of Broker-Dealers

    110 questions
  • Topic 04

    Regulation of Agents of Broker-Dealers

    160 questions
  • Topic 05

    Regulation of Securities and Issuers

    116 questions
  • Topic 06

    Remedies and Administrative Provisions

    141 questions
  • Topic 07

    Communication with Clients and Prospects

    162 questions
  • Topic 08

    Ethical Practices and Fiduciary Obligations

    114 questions

Sample questions

3 of many

A few questions from this unit, with the answer and a full explanation. The complete bank is available when you start practising.

  1. An agent represents an issuer in offering the issuer's own securities exclusively to institutional investors. Under the USA, this person is:

    • Required to register as an agent but exempt from examination requirements
    • Required to register as an agent because all persons who sell securities must be registered
    • Excluded from the definition of 'agent' and therefore not required to register as an agent
      Correct answer
    • Excluded only if the institutional investor is a bank or insurance company specifically
    Explanation

    Under the USA, individuals who represent an issuer in effecting transactions exclusively with institutional investors (such as banks, insurance companies, pension funds) are excluded from the definition of 'agent' and therefore not required to register as agents. This exclusion reflects the sophisticated nature of institutional investors who do not need the same level of regulatory protection as retail investors.

  2. Applying securities regulation to a case study: A company called GreenFarm LLC solicits investors online, offering them 'crop participation units' where investors contribute capital, GreenFarm manages farming operations, and profits are distributed proportionally. The company claims these are not securities and therefore need not be registered. Analyse this claim.

    • The claim is incorrect, but only because GreenFarm uses the internet to solicit investors, which automatically triggers federal securities registration requirements
    • The claim is correct because 'crop participation units' are not listed in the USA's definition of security and therefore fall outside its scope
    • The claim is correct because agricultural investments are specifically excluded from the definition of 'security' under federal and state law
    • The claim is likely incorrect; GreenFarm's crop participation units likely constitute investment contracts under the Howey test because investors contribute money to a common enterprise (the farming operation) expecting profits from GreenFarm's management efforts, not from their own work
      Correct answer
    Explanation

    GreenFarm's structure closely resembles the Howey case: investors invest money, in a common enterprise (GreenFarm LLC's farming operations), expecting profits primarily from GreenFarm's efforts (not the investors' own work). The name 'crop participation units' does not change the analysis — securities regulators look through labels to economic substance. This arrangement almost certainly constitutes an investment contract requiring registration, and the online solicitation may also trigger additional advertising restrictions.

  3. An investment adviser representative receives a phone call from a client who is considering investing in a new startup. The IAR knows the CEO of the startup is under a confidential SEC investigation that has not been made public. The IAR is unable to disclose the investigation due to its confidential nature. What is the most appropriate action for the IAR?

    • Disclose the existence of the SEC investigation to the client because the fiduciary duty to the client overrides confidentiality
    • Refer the client to another adviser and provide a summary of all known risk factors including the investigation
    • Decline to provide a recommendation about the startup while in possession of material non-public information, and explain to the client that the IAR cannot make a recommendation on that security at this time
      Correct answer
    • Recommend the investment because the investigation is not yet public and the IAR has no obligation to share it
    Explanation

    When an IAR possesses material non-public information about a security, the appropriate action is to refrain from providing a recommendation about that security. The IAR cannot disclose MNPI (which would itself potentially violate securities laws) but also cannot recommend the security while in possession of adverse MNPI. Explaining that a recommendation cannot be made at this time is the appropriate client communication.